I ventured out on a sunny Tuesday afternoon with the intention of grabbing some books from the library on my way to the supermarket for baking ingredients. Elated at having found the Salinger books that I came for, I delved into the book at the next available opportunity I had - today's one include squinting at the book's fine print as I walked toward AMK hub, though I later regretted terribly choosing to walk instead of hopping on the bus. Someone up there decided to reward my sudden motivation to exercise at every given opportunity with yet another one of the torrential downpours we've been experiencing so often these days.
But, really, you know you're partial to Salinger when even his dedications at the beginning of the book begin to sound very thought provoking. I for one can never read and run. If I like a book, like really love it, I have the tendency to research it to death. To squeeze the book dry of any experience it might be depriving me of. I have to know everything. Did I miss a nuance in character? Did a certain dialogue go right over my head when in fact it should have lighted an imaginary light bulb within me?
I think a lot of the persistent urge to rape a book of all it has to offer has to do with wanting to understand it better. I don't know. Please do not assume that I come into blogger with my thoughts all so organized, just waiting to be arranged into essay form. No, I think as I type, the thoughts file into my head in as haphazard a manner as you see before you. I think that when you love something, you want to understand it better. Perhaps it is in a bid to understand why you feel so passionately for it, to articulate your emotions. To reason, to rationalize your feelings into phrases such as 'unique style' and 'masterful storytelling'. Is it so hard for us to like a book just because, well, just because we like it, and not be forced to explain why?
I've always had this rather romantic fancy that when something is truly beautiful, when it touches something deep within you, it is quite indescribable. It's a silly little theory I had when I was younger (oh, much younger, and so naive) that should I venture to ask the guy who loves me, why he loves him, he'll stare at me quizzically, with a look of utmost affection, and say "I don't know, I just do." Its the same with art too. Art, beautiful art, should resound within you. It should make you gasp with breathless wonder. Your attention shouldn't have to be brought to the expert use of lines, or the clever play of colours before you can appreciate beautiful art. Beauty is an organic experience. We shouldn't need to be taught how to identify beauty. Am I before ridiculously naive? Is this merely a lame excuse for my complete inability to appreciate anything? Oh, it's not that you have no taste or preference, Rachel, you just haven't seen real beauty yet. Haha, how convenient.








